Tips for Installing FixPacks in Business Objects XI 3.1
Lately I have been faced with the need to install a FixPack on one of my Business Objects Enterprise XI 3.1 systems. Doing so has reminded me of some key points and tips that I wanted to share with the Business Objects community. FixPacking BO 3.1 is truly a different experience:
Not Your Father’s BO FixPack
Like everything else in life, FixPacks have changed and evolved with the Business Objects product. Some of the notable changes for BO XI 3.1 FixPacks are:
- FixPacks are no longer suite wide. You need the FixPack for the specific Business Objects product you wish to patch (such as Enterprise, Live Office, Crystal Reports 2008, etc.)
- You must first install the patch on a node where a CMS server is located. According to some SAP-BO support engineers the safest choice in a distributed environment is to install the FixPack one node/machine at a time. So if you have multiple CMS nodes, install on those first one at a time, then install on the other servers one at a time. This makes for a VERY lengthy FixPack deployment, but it is the safest method. I have also had several senior support engineers confirm that the only requirement is to patch 1 node hosting a CMS first, then after that patch is completely started you can patch all of the rest, staggering them by 5-10 minutes each.
- Stop all BO servers except for a single CMS, Input/Output File Repository Servers, CMS database, and Server Intelligence Agent (SIA). If a CMS in the cluster is not up and running the install will not work properly or at all (this is true for all servers, regardless of their role). The SI Agent must also remain up on all nodes to be patched.
- Czech and Finnish Language Packs are now available (as of FP 1.3/1.4)
FixPack Installer Beware
Here are a few cautions/warnings that stand out to me:
- EVERY Business Objects component must be on the same version. If you patch a dedicated CMS server, you must also patch any other nodes that are a part of your cluster, such as processing servers or Live Office servers, etc. Also any clients, Designer and DeskI need to be patched as well. Another reason to use WebI exclusively, no client patches needed (unless we are talking about WebI Rich Client).
- Don’t forget to redeploy the patched BusinessObjects web components. The deployment method will vary based on your original web component deployment.
- Temp Directory: When working with the Windows Installer Package, be sure to either manually extract the installation files to a desired location, or to change your user’s “TEMP” environment variable to the true location to which you want these very large and many files extracted. Actually, on second thought, ALWAYS change your “TEMP” path environment variable to a location with enough space (a few GB); I have seen the installer, in the midst of installing fill up my C: drive with temporary files that it works with after all of the unpacking and hours into the patch installation. Be careful here, plan ahead.
These are just a few of my notes and pointers for now on the top of my head. I will update this article later with my more complete notes or with any of your suggestions offered through the comments below.




I’ve been testing 3.1 for many months now and can’t seem to find the right combination of service packs and/or fixpacks. We wanted to go live on the most recent patch level possible but have had so many significant issues that we’ve had to do many reinstallations with different combinations and I’m wondering if you know what the most stable one is? Our implementation is relatively large (6,000 users in prod) and we use a bit of everything – Webi, Crystal, Xcelsius, Dashboards, etc. So far I have tried 3.1 with FixPack 1.8; 3.1 with SP2 and FixPack 2.7; 3.1 with SP2, FixPack 2.7 and SP3. The first one was ok but would not be very recent. The others have significant issues, primarily when trying to schedule Crystal or Webi reports. One issue was fixed by FixPack 2.7 but then reappears with SP3 and according to support, that’s because SP3 was built only from FixPack 2.5. I’m wondering how to develop a long-term patch management strategy for BO when the service / fixpacks are not cumulative.
Hi Cecelia, BO Support told you right. The fixes in FP 2.5 and in SP3 are the same. This is actually normal, that is to say that new Service Packs are usually started concurrent with the FP x.5 or x.6. This is one reason why you usually want to avoid installing an SP without at least one FP release. Having said this, FP 2.8 and FP 3.1 are equal in their fixes, but SP3 gives you some new color schemes and something else intangible. FP 3.1 was just released at the end of July.
I do understand and agree with your frustration. Where is the stability we were promised. All I am seeing is bloat lately and bugs. I am going to start a new article on XI 3.1 rants and raves and also another on patches. I hope you will find those and share your thoughts.
[...] a new article in nearly a month (although I just added some details to the latest article on BO XI 3.1 Fix Packs). Anyway, I have been busy on BusinessObjectsTips.com topics, this is [...]
Remember that the system environment variable TEMP trumps the user environment variable TEMP. And the fix pack installer WILL fill up your C:\ drive.
Hi! I currently have BOE XI 3.1 SP3 FP3.3, it is working good. After that I installed FP3.5 because of corrections. After the installation the server seemed to not work anymore… Connection to SAP BW is not working after FP3.5
Hi R. A., I am very sorry you have experienced such troubles. I know the risk is always there when patching. I don’t use SAP BW, but I can say that for the most part I am satisfied with FP 3.4, although it has some known issues as well.
Hi Julian,
We have ‘BO XI 3.1 SP3- 12.1.6.1116′ in PROD and I am reviewing patches. I believe there r 5 patchs after above ver: 3.1 to 3.5, correct?
I get confused while reviewing the issues fixed list in this doc https://websmp108.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/012003146900000037422011E/XI31_FP3_5_Fixed_Issues_en.pdf
Because it sometimes talk abt XI 3.1 SP2 FP 2.2, for e.g. ADAPT01371367.
How can I avoid confusion and just concentrate on patching XI 3.1 SP3? Any document links?
Thanks.
Hi Parik, don’t be discouraged by the mention of “SP2 FP 2.2″ in the “fixed issues” document, that may just be when the bug was discovered. In general if you want to install a fix pack it is usually advisable to look at the highest available fix pack applicable to your Business Objects XI system’s service pack level. Then you should review the fix pack’s release notes for known issues. If none of these known issues are deal breakers then you can proceed.
Determining fixed issues applicable to your installation can be more complex because it would require you to individually study all of the fixed issues for each fix pack that is greater than your patch level. It would be nice if SAP BusinessObjects could provide an online tool that allows you to put in your current patch level and targeted patch level and then the tool would output your expected fixed issues and known issues.
Hi Julian,
We just upgraded our sandbox to SP3 FP5, and will eventually be rolling this out to our Dev, QA and Prod systems, however,a concern that I have is with installing the latest client tools for 3.5. Are there any known issues that you are aware of with installing these? Any special steps that need to be taken to avoid major issues? Reason I ask is that when we installed the 2.6 client tools, we encountered numerous issues installing them, and all the issues were not related, which made it very frustrating to the end users.
Thanks,
Peter
Hi Peter, I can tell you that I had lots of trouble installing Fix Pack 3.4 on one of my machines and on many others. The Business Objects installer seems to have trouble with the “Software Inventory Tool”. I suggest you test as much as possible on the different client builds that may exist in your organization. Watch for any troubles with the “Software Inventory Tool”. As I recall, attempting to open the “Software Inventory Tool” before patching also resulted in a crash of that application.
Is there a way we can make the setup.exe file in the taskmanager use more memory? Will using PAE switch help in overcoming the 32 bit architecture limitation?
This will surely make the installation process faster.
In my experience the only way to get it to run faster is to NOT install too many language packs on the server. Those multiply the duration. Without them I don’t think I ever thought it ran too long. If you are not installing lots of language packs then I think either you are expecting too much or your hardware is too inferior for Business Objects.
Hi JK, I thought of one more thing. Sometimes anti-virus applications become over-protective and REALLY slow things down. Please try to disable your anti-virus software while installing Business Objects and you might see a performance boost.
Hi Julian,
I have yet another question. We have roles created in our BW system which we then import into our BOE system. I noticed that when we import them, they are prefixed with the logical system name of our SAP system. i.e BWD~100/rolename.
Is there any way to remove this prefix, or do we have to create the security in each BOE client separately? I seem to get issues when I tried to migrate the security from Dev to QA and it was because of this prefx.
Thanks,
Peter